The Wet Hinny Experience
The professor has an assignment for you:
1. Read the Equitation Science Symposium proceedings and write an essay on how these results will affect the way you train horses.
Of course, that is all good news, but let me introject a little cold hard reality here. I was up on Cracker Joe, just intending to do some stopping and turning, when he got agitated by my request to walk-on. He wanted to just do neck bending, I suppose. Well, it was wet and his back was wet. I hadn't put a saddle on him and I just had a halter with slobber straps on the side-rings. He took a notion to duck out, hump up his back, and run across the paddock. We were in the little paddock with tight corners and very high IRON PIPE RAILS. I knew he was going to duck out from under me and I didn't want it to result in my face impacting the iron rails, so I reached over and grabbed the fence. You can stick to a wet hinny better than just about any equine in the world, so my legs kept traveling with Cracker until my back had stretched to its limit and I snapped back to the ground with a thump. I collapsed to the ground and laid on the muddy paddock dirt until my habitual physical inventory told me that no serious damage had been incurred. Then I got up and was just a little hot under the collar.
I went to the tack shed and got a lunging rope and a lunging whip. Cracker got to learn to do half circles up against the rail. No mercy. No horse cookies. It was pure negative reinforcement and intentionally more negative than usual. He got release for good behavior, but he had knocked all the "nice guy" stuff out of me. I gave him all the commands I groundwork into my horses.... then I notice that just across the paddock fence Paisley is intently carrying out every one of my commands. Back, forward, gee, haw.... she is just working herself into a frenzy in hopes of getting a reward. Of course I had to start bridging her and rewarding her. She is such an awesome horse; I can't wait until she is old enough to ride.
Cracker Joe has dumped me a few too many times. I keep thinking that because I am training with positive reinforcement, he will maintain a more level head, but he gets really excited and is borderline disrespectful in his enthusiasm. One of the papers presented at that symposium showed that counter conditioning to a scary object (targeting the object) was less effective for desensitization than systematic approach/retreat. That is so to the point of what I am working on.... where will positive reinforcement give you a good result and where will it set you up for failure??? I think to maintain control over a hinny one needs to insist on absolute subordination.
Before I let Cracker go to his stall for dinner he had to let me handle his ears. Normally he is okay with that, but I knew that because he was mad at me, there would be resistance. I just stood by the gate and told him he had to put his ear into my hand. He knew what I wanted and finally made a tiny attempt to comply. I bridged him and opened the gate. There was two more gates he needed me to open, so by the time he got to eat dinner, he really didn't care if I touched his ears or not. He just wanted some alfalfa.
I have made a vow that from now on, I will wear my helmet and use a saddle. My shoulders and lower back are really going to be stiff tomorrow.
Yrs,
Patricia
Labels: conditioning, Cracker Joe, directing movement, ducking, equitation science, leadership, reinforcement






